The Sr. Supdt. Of Post Offices, 24/08/2010.
Pune City East Dn.Pune 411037
Sub: - Agenda for discussion of monthly meeting for the month of Aug -2010.Respected Madam,Agenda for discussion in monthly meeting for the month of Aug 2010 is submitted as below.The following representatives of NFPE Group’C’ union will present in the meeting. There relief arrangement may kindly be made in due course
1. Com. Y N Bamble, Divisional Secretary, & SA, PUNE HO.
2. Com. G R Khedkar, Member & OA , Division Office.
3. Com. A S Khedekar, Asstt. Secretary, & SA, PUNE HO.
1.NIBM RD fraud pending work.
Whatever work of verification and investigation in respect of NIBM PO
fraud case. It is brought to your kind notice that whatever investigation work which is related with fraud case for which checking and verification should have got completed by the competent controlling authority only, but should not be got completed from the operative clerical staff.
2.Speednet Dispatch work in software
As per the order received recently to dispatch of speed post articles through speednet software. It is not practically possible as time factor in between speed post dispatch. The margin of which is very short to implement such order one hour at list should be curtailed for the speed post counter. So as dispatch of speed post article can be made through speednet dispatch software practically according to its required actual time.
Since many of sub offices are quite busy with the all kind of transactions and heavy office workload.
3.Log Book of Delivery work.
It is reported and received compliant from the many SPMs from SOs that the
preparation of newly order of log book of delivery report should be stop immediately
because due to already over burden work and shortage of manpower. It is not practically possible for the SPM /Staff to prepare log book and to report Daily/ weekly.
4.Steel rack / almirah/ to provide to Mohammadwadi So.
It is requested that one new steel almirah should be arrange to provide to Mohammadwadi SO for immediately requirement to keep the office record in safety.
5.Supply of computer chairs to S.B. PARK PO
It is highly demanded from working staff and my union members of S.B PARK PO to provide new Computer wheel chairs of good qualities in replacement of old and broken condition chair.
6.Provide hardware of following SOs.
Following urgently requirement for SOs hardware is quite necessary to provide them
Immediately. These are as under.
1.S.B. PARK. 1 WEING SCALE
2.EAST KHADKI 1 WEING SCALE & BARCODE SCANER
3.DIGHI CAMP 1 PRINTER
4 SANGVI 1 WEING SCALE & BARCODE SCANER
7.Supply copies of circulars /orders.
It is brought to your kind notice that copy of your litho’s and circulars order is not been received by the Divisional Secretary of our union. Here after is should be ensured to sent copy of each circulars and order (except confidential matter)
It is also requested to provide latest updated copy of divisional gradational list and arrange to send it to the divisional secretary of our union.
8.Attached one LR Postman to Hadapsar SO
It is requested to attach one LR Postman at Hadapsar SO being for heavy delivery office.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
Monday, August 2, 2010
Communication of below benchmark grading in ACRs
To
Sr Supdt Of Post Offices
Pune City East Dn Pune 411030.
Sub: Communication of below benchmark grading in ACRs.
Ref : Your office letter No. PNCE/MACP /CR Corr /10 dated 19.7.2010
R /madam
The remarks “Average “regarding my performance communicated to me vide your office letterNo. PNCE /MACP /CR Corr /10 2010 dated 19.7.2010 is not acceptable to me . My representation against this remark is as under.
As per orders on the subject, the controlling authority is required to review the performance of the official working under him from time to time during the year under review .You have not asses my performance very well and correctly because I have not received a single letter of communication about my performance .I have not received any single warning or caution letter from you during last five years. Therefore your remarks “Average “are nearly on prejudice mind and such remarks are not treated as valid as per the guidelines issued by the ministry of Home Affairs from time to time.
Whenever adverse entry is recorded in any CR of the official he should be given reasonable opportunity to defend his case. Adverse remark can not be noted all of his sudden at the end of the year .It is also further stated in the guideline issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs and Personnel that the adverse remark should be based on Established facts and not near on suspicion /Personnel opinion.
You have certainly violated the guidelines, therefore I request you to expunge remarks from my CR for the last five years. Your letters asking my representation for the last five years remarks is totally violation of the orders issued by ministry of Affairs and Personnel .As per orders on the subject the “Adverse “remarks to be communicated in the month of April every year .Therefore causing of the explanation is for the adverse entry for the last five years is uncalled for .So I do not accept the remarks communicated to me.
Thanking you yours faithfully
Sr Supdt Of Post Offices
Pune City East Dn Pune 411030.
Sub: Communication of below benchmark grading in ACRs.
Ref : Your office letter No. PNCE/MACP /CR Corr /10 dated 19.7.2010
R /madam
The remarks “Average “regarding my performance communicated to me vide your office letterNo. PNCE /MACP /CR Corr /10 2010 dated 19.7.2010 is not acceptable to me . My representation against this remark is as under.
As per orders on the subject, the controlling authority is required to review the performance of the official working under him from time to time during the year under review .You have not asses my performance very well and correctly because I have not received a single letter of communication about my performance .I have not received any single warning or caution letter from you during last five years. Therefore your remarks “Average “are nearly on prejudice mind and such remarks are not treated as valid as per the guidelines issued by the ministry of Home Affairs from time to time.
Whenever adverse entry is recorded in any CR of the official he should be given reasonable opportunity to defend his case. Adverse remark can not be noted all of his sudden at the end of the year .It is also further stated in the guideline issued by the Ministry of Home Affairs and Personnel that the adverse remark should be based on Established facts and not near on suspicion /Personnel opinion.
You have certainly violated the guidelines, therefore I request you to expunge remarks from my CR for the last five years. Your letters asking my representation for the last five years remarks is totally violation of the orders issued by ministry of Affairs and Personnel .As per orders on the subject the “Adverse “remarks to be communicated in the month of April every year .Therefore causing of the explanation is for the adverse entry for the last five years is uncalled for .So I do not accept the remarks communicated to me.
Thanking you yours faithfully
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)